This Act is effective 1 January 2012 for companies and 1 March 2012 for taxpayers other than companies, except certain changes to the regime with regard to withholding tax on interest, which is deemed to have come into effect on 1 March 2009.
In this newsletter we draw the readers’ attention to any action required to be taken. In a special newsletter on this Act circulated early January, more detail is provided, which can be accessed at this link to our website.
1. Employer Funded Policies
What to do?
Companies:
A number of retirement arrangements have been set up in the past capitalizing on a ‘loop hole’ in the Act. This allowed employers to deduct premiums paid in respect of life policies taken out on the lives of employees (e.g. funeral policies, keyman policies, group life schemes outside an approved fund etc.). The ‘loop hole’ allowed the policy proceeds due in the event of death of any employee to be paid to the employee’s dependents or nominees tax free.
Policy proceeds upon the death of an employee are now taxable in the hands of the employer, if the employer claimed any premiums in respect of the relevant policy for tax purposes, in the past. An employer who maintains such a life assurance scheme needs to introduce a new employment policy to define its intention regarding the impact of tax on the gross proceeds. i.e. will the employer carry the cost or will the cost be passed on to the beneficiary/ies? If the tax is to be recovered from the gross proceeds before affecting payment to any beneficiary/ies, procedures and controls need to be introduced to ensure that the gross proceeds are reduced by the tax effect before paying a benefit.
2. Commutation of Small Pension Fund Annuities
What to do?
Trustees:
Trustees need to consider whether they want to draw their pensioners’ attention to this opportunity, recognizing that the payment of every annuity normally attracts a fee either based on the annuity capital, or a transaction based fee or both.
3. Education Policies
What to do?
Companies:
This means that where one of your staff members claims premiums towards an educational policy against the taxable income administered by your company, we suggest that you consider the following:
Individuals:
To ensure that proceeds from an education policy are not subjected to income tax, the employee needs to ascertain that the purpose of the policy is to provide capital for -
4. Withholding Tax on Interest
What to do?
Individuals:
For financial planning purposes, take into account that there is no withholding tax on bills and bonds issued by Government, regional and local authorities or on negotiable instruments issued by a local bank.
5. Withholding Tax on Services Payments to Non-residents
What to do?
Companies, trustees and individuals:
Ascertain whether you have any business dealings with any foreigner, where no double taxation agreement exists with Namibia (note that SA has a double taxation agreement with Namibia). If you do, ascertain whether these dealings fall into the ambit of the definitions of “entertainment fee”, “management or consultancy fee” or director’s fees. If they do, inform your business associate that you will be obliged to withhold 25% as from 1 January 2012 (all companies), respectively 1 March 2012 (all tax payers other than a company). Institute systems and procedures to identify taxable services, separately record the tax withheld from the gross amount, ascertain that all amounts withheld are paid over to Inland Revenue on or before the 20th of the month following the month in which any amount was withheld and complete the required form to accompany such payments.
Trustees and directors of unit trust management companies take note that funds and unit trusts are defined to be a ‘company’ and are therefore required to start deducting withholding tax as from 1 January 2012.
|
Dear reader
Individuals: To ensure that proceeds from an education policy are not subjected to income tax, the employee needs to ascertain that the purpose of the policy is to provide capital for -
4. Withholding Tax on Interest
|
The Financial Intelligence Act Amendment
Government Notice 235 as published in Gazette no 4850 of 15 December 2011, at long last clarifies the situation of pension funds. Section 19 of Schedule 1 which lists accountable institutions, was amended effective 18 November, by excluding from this list “(a) a registered pension fund or provident fund as defined in section 1 of the Pension Funds Act…and (b) a registered fund as defined in section 1 of the Medical Aid Funds Act…”
For the more technically minded – section 1 of the Pension Funds Act only defines a ‘pension fund’, it does not make mention of a provident fund. Furthermore, retirement annuity funds are also pension funds in terms of the Pension Funds Act. Where does the amendment leave these funds? We believe they will be equally excluded, but was this the intention since they do receive moneys from members of the general public.
The Unit Trust Control Act Amendment
Government Notice 231 as published in Gazette no 4847 of 9 December 2011, introduces a number of changes to the Act. Text in square brackets is removed from the Act, text underlined is inserted.
Amongst other changes, it introduces a definition of ‘assets’ being “…the investments comprising or constituting a unit portfolio of a unit trust scheme, and includes any income and accruals derived there from;”
It deletes the previous definitions of ‘approved securities’ and of ‘liquid assets’.
It introduces a definition of ‘open-ended investment company’, being “…a company with an authorized share capital which is structured in such a manner that it provides for the issuing of different classes of shares to investors, each class of shares representing a separate portfolio with a distinct investment policy;” Is this making reference now to entities such as Stimulus?
The definition of ‘trust deed’ is substituted, now being “…the agreement between a management company and a trustee, and includes a document of incorporation whereby a unit trust scheme is established and in terms of which it is administered;”
The definition of ‘unit trust scheme’ is substituted, now meaning “…any scheme or arrangement [in the nature of a trust], in whatever form, including an open ended investment company, in pursuance of which members of the public are invited [or permitted, as beneficiaries under the trust,] to acquire an interest or undivided share (whether called a unit or by any other name) in one or more unit portfolios and to participate proportionately in the income or profits derived therefrom, whether the value of such interest, unit or undivided share which may be acquired remains constant or varies from time to time;”
Does this now draw the Allan Gray Namibia Investment Trust and Stimulus into the ambit of the Act?
In line with an amendment to regulation 28 of the Pension Funds Act, it introduces a definition of ‘unlisted assets’ being “…securities other than stock exchange securities and such other securities determined by the registrar by notice in the Gazette;”
The amount of minimum prescribed share capital is removed from the Act. This will presumably be determined in Government Notices from time to time in future.
It introduces a new section dealing with changes in the name of management companies, in their shareholding and directors and provides for the appointment and removal of directors and management staff of such companies.
A number of other specifics in the Act are removed and will presumably be dealt with by the Minister in a less formal manner through proclamation in the Gazette.