Dear reader

In this newsletter we focus on the purpose of a retirement fund. This is too often overlooked when product providers introduce changes to your fund, regularly not without a self interest in the product being proposed or in locking your fund up in a relationship with the product provider. We also provide outsider views on some topical subjects such as selecting an asset manager because of last year’s stellar performance, issues of relevance to recent retirees, what a trustee should bring to the table, pitfalls of living annuities that were addressed by ASISA and more...

We hope that you find this newsletter interesting reading, once again. And please feel free to comment: tell us what you value and how we can improve the content.

Regards

Tilman Friedrich

Tilman Friedrich's Industry Forum

WHAT YOUR RETIREMENT FUND SHOULD AIM TO ACHIEVE

Funds should provide adequately for retirement

Most trustees would probably know that the purpose of their fund is to provide adequately for retirement, perhaps for disablement and death as well. But, ‘to provide adequately for retirement, or disablement or death’ – what does this actually mean? Why do you actually need a fund for these purposes? We all know that we can individually make our own insurance and savings arrangements according to our own needs and requirements, without being ‘straight jacketed’ into the employer’s retirement fund.

Why have a pension fund?

Let’s revisit the main reasons for setting up a retirement fund to provide for retirement, disablement and death before we examine what ‘provide for’ means. Honing in on the many reasons, one needs to recognize the main stakeholder of retirement provision which are: firstly, the government, secondly the employer and thirdly, the member.

Government is a key stakeholder in retirement provision

Government clearly has an interest in its subjects providing for retirement, disablement and death to relieve the burden on the fiscus to look after those that can no longer provide for themselves and their families due to superannuation, incapacity or death. To encourage its citizens to make their own provision, government offers special tax incentives via the Income Tax Act, not availed to any other savings vehicle. In addition, government has thrown a special protective net over retirement fund savings via the Pension Funds Act that is not availed to any other savings vehicle.

The employer is a key stakeholder in retirement provision

Let’s now turn to the employer as another key stakeholder. Considering that there is currently no legal obligation on an employer to offer a retirement fund arrangement to its staff, the question begs to be asked, why an employer would have any interest in a retirement fund and why is it then that the majority of employers do actually burden themselves with the responsibilities and obligations linked to the introduction and maintenance of a retirement fund? Why does the employer not simply hand over the cash to the employee and let the employee care for himself? After all, they are all mature adults and the employer not their tutelage. Fact of life unfortunately proves these assumptions wrong! So the employer has to think long-term on behalf of his employees, a social responsibility that will allow the employer to sleep in peace. But this is not the only reason. In today’s competitive labour market, an employer who does not offer pension benefits, will be at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to attracting and retaining scarce skills, so market forces pressure the employer into offering pension benefits.

The employee is a key stakeholder in retirement provision

Where does the employee as third key stakeholder stand with regard to pension arrangements? As we just read, employees of course prefer to have the cash in their back pockets, at least while they are young, healthy and in a sound financial position. When any of these parameters change and as the employee gets older, starts thinking about his kids and their future and about his own old age, the perspective starts changing. Trying to make personal arrangements at this point would be either too late or one would be barred for reason of pre-existing conditions that no one in his right mind would be prepared to underwrite anymore.

Government wants the private sector to make provision for retirement

The long and the short of this is that government wants the employer and the employee to make provision for old age and other situations and offers very attractive incentives to the employees in particular. Employers feel a moral and competitive compulsion and employees are probably split equally on the issue.

‘To provide adequately’ – is it in the eyes of the beholder?

Having considered the reasons for retirement funds the next question to answer is what ‘to provide adequately for retirement, disablement and death actually means. Since all of us incur regular monthly costs to live that are related to our income, while we incur ad hoc outlays only infrequently. The main objective of a retirement fund should then be to replace one’s regular income come retirement. For retirement, an accepted international norm is to achieve an income replacement ratio post retirement of 2% per year of service. This means that you would only be able to replace your income before retirement one on one, if you have been employed for 50 years! Most of us won’t be in that category but would look rather at 30 or 40 years of service at best. Considering that the capital available at retirement is a function of contributions made and investment returns earned.

How much do I need to put aside to retire with dignity?

If we assume that when I retire at 60, the pension of 2% per year of service is to provide for my surviving spouse at a reduced pension after my demise and that this pension is to sort of keep up with inflation, I would need capital at retirement of around 7 times my annual cost of living at the time. To get to 7 times my annual cost of living, I would have to put aside a net 14% of my cost of living (or monthly income) earning a net 3% above inflation. If my money earns a net investment return of 5% net above inflation, I only need to set aside 10% net, or if I earn 7% net above inflation, I only need to set aside 7% net of my cost of living (or monthly income). Higher investment returns imply higher risk, but in the reasonable safety offered in the retirement fund environment, a return of 7% net above inflation can be achieved in the most aggressive pension fund portfolios. A note from the market here – in Namibia the average gross contribution towards retirement is in the region of between 10% and 11%, between employee and employer.

What you need to bear in mind in all of these calculations though is that you need to be a member of the fund when you enter employment until you reach retirement. The contribution towards the fund must be based on your total remuneration throughout, rather than perhaps just the cash component. When you change job you must preserve your accumulated capital for retirement. Given this, you should be able to replace your income before retirement at a ratio of 80% if you join the fund at 20, retire at 60 and maintained the appropriate contribution ratio, and achieved the required investment return throughout. Should you have joined the fund only at age 30, the replacement ratio would decline to 60%.

What about death and disablement?

So now you should have an idea what it means to provide adequately for retirement. What we have not looked at yet is what it means to provide adequately for the event of death or disablement. This we will be looking at in the next newsletter. Suffice it to point out here that this has a cost implication that would have to be added to what we have arrived at when considering retirement. And of course nothing comes for free, so on top of all these elements you will eventually also have to add the cost of managing such an arrangement.

Charlotte Drayer's Administration Forum

PENSIONS PURCHASED FROM THE FUND

In the event of retirement, funds that still offer pensions, generally offer a standard pension to the retiree, often with a reduced spouse’s and sometimes even with children’s pensions in the event of the death of the pensioner. The pension may be guaranteed for a period of five years and up to ten years, which means that the full pension will continue to be paid to the spouse (or a nominated dependant), should the pensioner die before the guaranteed period has expired and only thereafter will the pension reduce. Sometimes the member may also apply to the trustees to change the standard pension benefits e.g. a shorter or longer guaranteed period.

Some funds provide a pooled pension, which is a fixed regular pension that may be increased at the discretion of the trustees on an annual basis depending on returns achieved by the fund. Upon the death of the last recipient of a pension, any balance of the initial capital, less all pensions paid up to that date (as calculated by the actuary), is often paid out to any nominee of the pensioner or is paid into his estate.

An alternative pension option offered by some funds is a ‘living annuity’ pension. In this case the portion of the member’s share used to secure the pension is increased with the returns of the fund and reduced by the pension that is drawn by the pensioner. The minimum pension that may be drawn is 5% p.a. of the capital and the maximum is 20% p.a., although some funds stipulate a lower maximum. The pensioner can review each year the rate at which he wants to withdraw capital in the form of a pension, within these parameters. This type of pension allows the pensioner to manage his/her capital according to the individual needs within the given parameters.

It is important to be informed what pension is provided by the fund. One should be aware of the options available and give clear instructions as to what pension is required.