Issued April 2025
 
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.   
 
In this newsletter...
  Benchtest 03.2025 – FIMA restarted; RBS for Namibia; heads-up on overregulation, and more...  
 
Jump to...
     
IMPORTANT NOTES AND REMINDERS
 
  NAMFISA levies
  • Funds with April 2024 year-ends must submit their 2nd levy returns and payments by 23 May 2025;
  • Funds with October 2024 year-ends must submit their 1st levy returns and payments by 23 May 2025; and
  • Funds with May 2024 year-ends must submit their final levy returns and payments by 30 May 2025.
Repo rate unchanged in April

The repo rate remained unchanged at 6.75% during April. The interest rate of 10.75% on funds’ direct loans and repayments will remain unchanged for May 2025.

Budget proposals
  • The Minister of Finance’s 2025/2026 budget proposes lifting the maximum amount a pension fund may pay in cash, tax-free at retirement, from N$50,000 to N$375,000.
  • The maximum housing allowance of an employer’s housing scheme is to be capped at N$400,000. One-third of the amount is tax-free.
  Registered service providers

Certain pension fund service providers must register with NAMFISA and report to NAMFISA. Download a list of service providers registered as of June 2024, here...

Retirement calculator

Use our web-based retirement and risk shortfall calculator for your personal retirement planning. Find it here...

If you need help with your financial planning, get in touch with
  • Annemarie Nel (tel 061-446 073)
  • Christina Linge (061-446 075)
  • Dennis Fabianus (061-446 098)
Toolbox for trustees

RFS provides comprehensive support for trustees. Find a list of download documents to assist with governance and management of private funds, registered as of June 2024, here...
 
  
IN THIS NEWSLETTER...
 
 
In this newsletter, we address the following topics:
 
 
 
In 'Tilman Friedrich's industry forum' we present...
  • Monthly review of portfolio performance – 31 March 2025
  • ‘Hurricane Trump’ and the bigger picture
  • The FIM Act – a new start: RF.S.5.10, RF.S.5.13, and RF.S.5.15
  • A model for risk-based supervision for Namibia
  • BON Governor warns against over-regulation
In Compliments, read...
  • A compliment from a principal officer
In 'News from RFS', read about...
  • RFS celebrating 35 years of Namibian independence
  • RFS shares views on financial services sector with Forbes Africa
  • RFS sponsors the SKW soccer tournament
  • RFS sponsors Windhoek Karneval
  • RFS sponsors teacher and assistant’s day
  • Elevate your fund experience with EPIC
  • The Retirement Compass
In News from NAMFISA read about...
  • Notes of the industry meeting of 27 March
  In 'Legal snippets', read about...
  • Admissibility of affidavits in death benefit claims
  • Death benefit payment: L Dickson v Netcare Pension Fund and anothe
In 'Snippets for the pension funds industry,' read about...
  • Diversify or di-worse-ify
  • Diversifying your portfolio beyond forex
In ‘Snippets of general interest', read about...
  • Vishing: the voice scam you need to know about
  • Investing offshore: a brief guide
  • Essentials of a power of attorney
And make a point of reading what our clients say about us in the ‘Compliments’ section. It should give you a good appreciation of who and what we are!

As always, your comment is welcome, so open a new mail and drop us a note!

Regards
Tilman Friedrich
 
 
TILMAN FRIEDRICH'S INDUSTRY FORUM
  
Monthly Review of Portfolio Performance
to 31 March 2025
  
  In March 2025, the average prudential balanced portfolio returned 0.1% (February 2025: -0.2%). The top performer is the Allan Gray Balanced Fund, with 1.8%, while the NAM Coronation Balanced Plus Fund, with minus 1.4%, takes the bottom spot. Allan Gray Balanced Fund took the top spot for the three months, outperforming the ‘average’ by roughly 2.6%. The Stanlib Managed Fund underperformed the ‘average’ by 2.1% on the other end of the scale. Note that these returns are before (gross of) asset management fees.

The Monthly Review of Portfolio Performance to 31 March 2025 reviews portfolio performances and provides insightful analyses.  Download it here...
 
 
‘Hurricane Trump’ and the bigger picture
  
  The US is much more than President Trump and will sail the seas long after his demise. So the bigger picture remains its global supremacy and singularity even after Hurricane Trump’. If it was left to Europe, the world would still live in peace for another three years. But will the East afford it the time, and must the investor now adopt a short-term strategy?
 
Market volatility is normal and should not derail a well-planned long-term investment strategy. Investors can navigate the ups and downs by staying the course, focusing on long-term growth, and taking advantage of market dips. Investors must know their needs and adapt their investment strategy to short-term needs.
 
Investing during times of uncertainty requires a balanced approach that combines defensive strategies with opportunistic investments. While the potential for global conflict and economic downturns poses significant risks, it also presents opportunities for those who can navigate the complexities of the market. By focusing on value, diversifying geographically, and being flexible in your asset allocation, you can position yourself to protect and grow your discretionary assets in future years.
 
These strategies should be tailored to your financial situation, risk tolerance, long-term goals and investment horizon.

Read paragraph 6 of the Monthly Review of Portfolio Performance to 31 March 2025 for our views on investment markets and global political developments. It also reviews portfolio performances and provides insightful analyses. Download it here...
 
 
 
The FIM Act – a new start
Contributed by Carmen Diehl, C.A.(Namibia), Senior Manager: Risk Management and Compliance
 
 
This is a summary of main provisions of draft standards and regulations under the FIM Act and implication for retirement funds.

The FIMA (Act 2 of 2021) was promulgated in Government Gazette no. 7645 on 1 October 2021. The Minister of Finance has not yet set a date for it to become effective. It has hibernated ever since, but following last year’s elections, we will see action on it again in 2025, once the new Minister of Finance has found her feet. NAMFISA, however, has not been idle, spending a lot of time revising and issuing FIMA standards and regulations. In the next few issues of this newsletter, we will present the latest status on the standards and regulations and provide a brief overview.

 
This summarises the main provisions of draft standards and regulations under the FIM Act and implications for retirement funds.

Standards Chapter 5: Retirement Funds 
  • RF.S.5.10 The conditions on which a defined contribution fund may be exempted from the requirement of regular investigations by a valuator
    • The statement applies to defined contribution funds who want to apply for exemption from regular investigations by a valuator.
    • Summary:
      • The standard sets out the requirements for exemption from actuarial valuations for defined contribution funds:
      • the total assets of the fund must be equal to or exceed the total of the members’ individual accounts, the expense reserve, and any undistributed investment returns for the three preceding years;
      • retirement benefits must be fully secured by an insurance policy;
      • any benefit other than the member’s individual account must be fully secured by an insurance policy;
      • no reserves other than an expense reserve may be maintained, and any excess assets are required to be fully distributed annually to the members.
      • An application for exemption must be made to NAMFISA and must be accompanied by certain documents.
    • What to do:
      If a fund wants to be valuation exempt, its rules must mirror the above requirements for valuation exemption.
  • RF.S.5.13 Requirements of a communication strategy
    • This Standard applies to –
      • all funds;
      • retirement income providers that have contracts in force relating to the payment of retirement income in respect of retirement benefits arising out of transfers of money or investments from funds upon the retirement of members or inactive members;
      • members of the board of funds; and
      • service providers to funds and retirement income providers to the extent that their responsibilities involve communications with:
      • boards and principal officers of, or other service providers to, funds;
      • retirement income providers; and
      • active, inactive, and retired members having funds held or invested by funds or retirement income providers.
    • Summary:
      • The standard outlines the requirements for a communication strategy to be adopted by the board of a retirement fund.
      • It emphasises the need for clear, simple, and non-technical communication language.
      • The communication strategy must cover various types of communications, including those with members, employers, sponsors, and regulatory authorities.
      • The communication strategy should ensure regular, detailed information flow regarding benefits and contributions, fund performance, and legislative changes and must include measures to minimise untraceable members.
      • It also mandates secure electronic access to information for members and regular assessments of the communication function.
      • Additionally, the communication strategy must ensure that promotional materials are factual and that members are fully informed about their rights and any applicable charges or penalties.
    • What to do:
      • Funds and fund service providers will need to review their communication strategy with parties to the fund to ensure that the strategy meets the guidelines in the standard.
      • Funds and fund service providers who do not yet have a communication strategy concerning their dealings with parties to the fund need to prepare a communication strategy.
  • RF.S.5.15 Requirements for the annual report of a fund to NAMFISA
    • This Standard applies to -
      • funds;
      • members of the boards of trustees of funds;
      • principal officers of funds and
      • service providers for funds to the extent that their responsibilities require them to support principal officers and boards of funds regarding matters disclosed in the fund's annual report to NAMFISA and in the preparation of the report.
    • Summary:
      • The standard defines the requirements for the annual report of a retirement fund to NAMFISA.
      • It specifies that the board of the fund must prepare the annual report within six months after the end of the fund’s financial year.
      • The annual report must include, as a minimum, in so far as not already included in the annual financial statement of the fund, summaries of board activities, legal actions to which the fund was a party, amendments to fund rules, fund policies that are in force and changes to those policies, key financial data and changes in the fund’s membership.
      • The report must also detail the fund's administrative activities, special events, key risks, and mitigating actions and contain a list of all service level agreements with details of their review periods.
      • For defined contribution funds, the report should also disclose the investment policy, including investment options available to members and annual rates of return on the fund’s investments.
      • For defined benefit funds, the report must also include annual rates of return for the most recent five years, the results of the most recent financial soundness investigation, and any developments affecting the fund's solvency.
    • What to do:
      • The requirements of this standard must be included in the fund’s communication strategy.
      • Trustees should identify the information required to comply with this standard other than the information already included in the annual financial statements.
      • The service level agreements with relevant service providers must be revised to reflect the responsibilities of the service providers concerning this standard, including the information required from service providers, together with turnaround times to support the standard's requirements.
 
A Model for Risk-based Supervision for Namibia
 
  NAMFISA recently engaged stakeholders regarding the introduction of a Risk-Based Supervisory model. The model envisages nine steps and emphasises the trustees’ responsibility for mitigating the risks. However, given Namibia’s unique environment, is this model appropriate? This question will be explored further on.

1. The nine steps of NAMFISA’s proposed risk-based supervision (RBS)

NAMFISA will follow a structured process to assess the risks faced by pension funds:
  1. Understanding the Fund: Analysing the fund's business, the economy, and industry trends.
  2. Identifying Significant Activities: Determining the key operations of the fund (e.g., investments, benefit administration).
  3. Assessing Inherent Risks: Evaluating the risks naturally present in each activity (e.g., investment risk, operational risk).
  4. Assessing Operational Management, Oversight and Governance: Reviewing how well the fund manages its risks.
  5. Assessing the Residual Risk: Determining the remaining risk after applying controls.
  6. Assessing Overall Residual Risk: Combining the risks of all activities.
  7. Assessing Funding, Earnings, and Liquidity: Checking the fund's financial health.
  8. Assessing the Overall Risk Profile: Creating a complete picture of the fund's risk.
  9. Developing an Intervention Strategy: Planning how NAMFISA will address identified risks.
    • Macro Factors: Economic conditions, industry trends, and regulatory changes.
    • Environmental Factors: GDP, interest rates, inflation, political stability, etc.
    • Industry Factors: Analysis of industry trends and information from rating agencies.
    • Significant Activities: Key operations like investments, benefit administration, and contribution collection.
    • Inherent Risks: Operational, credit, market, market conduct, strategic, and legal/regulatory risks.
    • Quality of Risk Management (QRM): How well the fund's management and oversight functions manage risks.
How does this affect pension fund trustees?
  1. Increased Scrutiny: Trustees should expect more detailed and risk-focused oversight from NAMFISA.
  2. Focus on Risk Management: Trustees must ensure their funds have strong risk management processes.
  3. Improved Reporting: Funds must provide accurate, timely, and transparent data to NAMFISA.
  4. Emphasis on Governance: Trustees must demonstrate strong governance and oversight.
  5. Understanding the Risk Matrix: Trustees should understand how the risk matrix assesses and rates their fund's risks.
  6. Ladder of Supervisory Intervention: Trustees should know that NAMFISA will take graded actions based on the fund's risk rating.
  7. Data Quality: Trustees will need to ensure that all data submitted to NAMFISA is of high quality.
  8. Understanding of macro and microeconomic factors: Trustees must understand how these factors affect the fund's investments and its ability to pay out benefits.
2. Adapting RBS to our unique circumstances

NAMFISA’s transition from compliance-based supervision to Risk-Based Supervision (RBS) is a commendable step towards proactive and efficient regulatory oversight; however, given the unique structure of the Namibian pensions industry, where only the Government Institutions Pension Fund (GIPF) operates with full internal administration, while other funds outsource key functions to third-party service providers, such as administrators, consultants, and asset managers. Recognising the unique operational environment of the industry, NAMFISA should adapt the RBS approach to ensure effective and efficient supervision.

3. Key Observations

Industry Structure and Systemic Risks
  1. The Namibian pensions industry comprises approximately 60 funds, covering 330,000 members with N$ 234 billion in assets.
  2. The GIPF alone holds 151,000 members and N$168 billion in assets, representing roughly half of the industry and making it the dominant player.
  3. Except for the GIPF, all other funds outsource benefit design, administration, and investment management to a few established third-party service providers.
  4. Third-party service providers effectively manage the operational risks of multiple funds, making them key systemic entities.
NAMFISA’s Proposed RBS Model

NAMFISA’s nine-step RBS model assesses risk at the individual fund level. While these nine steps align with global best practices, the focus on third-party-managed small and medium-sized funds creates regulatory blind spots in operational risk and cybersecurity, diverting resources unnecessarily to small and medium-sized funds whose boards effectively do not manage their operational risks.

4. Recommendations for an Enhanced RBS Model
  • Shift Supervision Focus to Third-Party Service Providers
    • Challenge: NAMFISA treats each pension fund as a separate entity, even though operational risks are concentrated among a few service providers.
    • Recommendation:
      • Classify third-party service providers as systemic risk entities requiring direct oversight.
      • Establish service provider risk scores based on financial stability, IT security, and operational resilience.
  • Strengthen Risk Oversight of Outsourced Operations
    • Challenge: NAMFISA’s framework does not differentiate between GIPF (which is self-administered) and funds outsourcing their key management functions.
    • Recommendation:
      • Create two supervisory streams:
      • Direct supervision of GIPF as a fully integrated pension entity.
      • Indirect oversight of funds through their third-party service providers.
      • Require third-party service providers to submit consolidated risk reports covering all client funds.
  • Introduce Cybersecurity and IT Resilience as a Regulatory Priority
    • Challenge: NAMFISA’s model does not explicitly address IT security risks despite administrators and asset managers managing critical pension data.
    • Recommendation:
      • Implement annual cybersecurity audits for third-party service providers handling pension fund operations.
      • Develop minimum cybersecurity standards aligned with global best practices.
      • To protect member data and pension payments, mandate business continuity and disaster recovery plans for third-party service providers.
  • Optimise NAMFISA’s Resource Allocation
    • Challenge: NAMFISA employs approximately 30 staff directly for pension fund supervision yet oversees 60 funds and multiple third-party service providers.
    • Recommendation:
      • Reduce direct supervision of small and medium-sized, low-risk funds and reallocate regulatory staff towards higher-risk service providers and the GIPF.
      • Implement a tiered intervention model, focusing more resources on high-risk entities.
5. Conclusion

NAMFISA’s transition to Risk-Based Supervision is a positive move towards safeguarding the Namibian pensions industry. However, NAMFISA must adjust its focus towards third-party service providers, given their critical role in fund operations, to ensure its effectiveness. By implementing service provider risk scoring, cybersecurity audits, and optimising regulatory resources, NAMFISA can better protect pension fund members and provide financial system stability.

 
BON Governor warns against over-regulation
  
  The Brief reported in its 4 April issue that ‘the Bank of Namibia (BoN) Governor Johannes !Gawaxab has cautioned against excessive regulation, warning that stringent policies could hinder economic growth and drive businesses into the informal sector. He stressed the need for a regulatory framework that fosters business efficiency and investment while ensuring consumer protection. “Namibia is a developing country, yet our regulations often mirror those of more advanced economies. We must acknowledge that our unique socio-economic challenges require a regulatory approach that is both flexible and progressive,” !Gawaxab said. The Governor highlighted the risks of excessive regulation, citing its potential to stifle innovation, discourage investment, and push businesses into the informal economy. He also emphasised the importance of fostering a regulatory environment that enables businesses to operate efficiently while maintaining necessary safeguards for consumer protection.”
 
The topic of overregulation is close to our hearts, and we have on numerous occasions lamented our regulators slavishly following the advice of experts from developed countries. Regarding the impact of the FIMA on the pensions industry, we have repeatedly expressed our concern about the high governance and compliance costs associated with this new law, which fund members and pensioners will ultimately bear. This law contains around 600 compliance requirements for retirement funds and their administrators. Considering the wide discretion the law affords the regulator in interpreting governance and compliance requirements and regulating these, it will be impossible for any service provider and fund to avoid severe penalties for failure to meet the law’s requirements, in the regulator’s opinion.
 
Considering our new President’s resolve to reduce costs through a leaner government structure. Should our regulators not also follow her example? I suggest that now is the time to pause and reevaluate the appropriateness of the FIMA to avoid overregulation and its consequences, as the BON Governor cautioned.
 
 
 
COMPLIMENT
 
 
Compliment from a principal officer
Dated 1 April 2025
 
“Hi Jolene
 
Thank you for your prompt response. I truly appreciate it.
 
The new benefits statement looks fantastic! The design and overall presentation are impressive, making it visually appealing and user-friendly. Kudos to the development team for their excellent work creating such a well-structured and professional statement.
 
Looking forward to its implementation.
 
Kind regards.”

 
 
  
 
Read more comments from our clients, here...
 
  
BENCHMARK: A NOTE FROM GÜNTER PFEIFER
 
Circulars issued by the Fund
 
  The Benchmark Retirement Fund did not issue any new circular or announcement after -
  • 202502 – Risk benefits provided via the fund 
Clients are welcome to contact us if they require a copy of any circular.
 
 
NEWS FROM RFS
 
RFS celebrates 35 years of Namibian independence
 
  On the occasion of Namibia's 35th-anniversary celebrations, staff dressed beautifully in their traditional attire.
   
   
  
RFS shares views on financial services sector with Forbes Africa
 
  RFS MD Marthinuz Fabianus had an exclusive interview with Forbes Africa. He discussed RFS’ strategic vision for Namibia's financial services sector, pension fund opportunities, and its commitment to driving economic growth as Namibia celebrates 35 years of independence. RFS Fund Administrators were grateful for the opportunity to share insights highlighting the critical role of financial services in Namibia’s development.
   
   
   
RFS sponsors the SKW soccer tournament
 
  RFS has been a main sponsor of the SKW youth soccer tournament since 2000, continuing its 15-year tradition of supporting Namibian youth football with a generous sponsorship for the tournament from 25-27 April 2025 on the SKW sports fields.

This sponsorship demonstrates RFS’ long-standing commitment to developing young football talent in Namibia. With 65+ teams across U7-U15 categories, RFS is proud to help tomorrow’s stars showcase their skills! (photo attached)
 
In the photo, director Kai Friedrich hands over the sponsorship to Leander Schatz of SKW to celebrate this enduring partnership.
   
   
  
   
RFS sponsors Windhoek Karneval
 
  RFS has been a faithful sponsor of the Windhoek Karneval since 2004. This year, RFS sponsored KIKAWI, an event for our youth and school-going kids in the name of the Benchmark Retirement Fund.
 
 
RFS director Kai Friedrich, leisurely dressed for this social event, collected the sponsor certificate and medal
 
The medal and certificate
 
 
RFS sponsors t-shirts for Holy Cross Convent
 
  Rauha Hangalo, senior manager of client services at RFS and parent of a Holy Cross Convent Pre-Primary School learner, arranged for RFS to sponsor T-shirts for Teachers and their Assistants at the Holy Cross Convent Pre-Primary School.
 
“Thank you to RFS Fund Administrators for sponsoring our beautiful teacher and assistant’s t-shirts – we love it”, said Sanja Kritzinger, the pre-primary school’s HOD, in recognising RFS’ sponsorship.
 
 
FLTR Maria Simunja (3rd), Rauha Hangalo (fifth), Sanja Kritzinger (HCC – sixth), Salomé Sloa (7th)
 
Sanja Kritzinger (teacher) and Rauha Hangalo
 
 
   
  Holy Cross Convent pre-primary school teacher’s assistants
 
RFS encourages complaints and fraud reporting
 
  NAMFISA assists the public in resolving complaints regarding non-banking financial institutions such as RFS, the Benchmark Retirement Fund or RFS Financial Advisers. However, it expects any complainant to have first unsuccessfully approached the relevant financial institutions regarding the complaint before it would assist.
 
The RFS website was expanded recently to allow the public to lodge complaints.
 
The RFS website also allows the public to confidentially alert an independent professional adviser about any suspected or committed fraud a person may become aware of regarding RFS, the Benchmark Retirement Fund or RFS Financial Advisers. The adviser will inform RFS management of the report without disclosing the reporting person's identity.
   
Elevate your fund experience with EPIC
 
  Members of funds administered by RFS can now access EPIC, its member communication platform, if the trustees agree to make the platform available to members.
 
Members can access benefits and investment values online from any place at any time.
 
Members of the Benchmark Retirement Fund take note that they have similar functionality through Benefit Counsellor.
 
We encourage our fund members to make the best use of these facilities.
   
   
 
The RETIREMENT COMPASS
 
  RFS Fund Administrators sponsor this newsletter as part of their social responsibility and initiatives to support the retirement fund industry. It aims to provide members of funds managed by RFS Fund Administrators and other parties in their network with retirement funding and planning-related news and insights, presented understandably.
 
This issue covers the following insightful articles:
  • Risk benefits through a retirement fund or an employer-owned scheme;
  • How Namibia’s oil discovery could affect retirement savings;
  • Retirement savings in southern Africa.
Don’t miss out on the latest Retirement Compass (vol 2, no 1) here...
 
  
Important circulars issued by RFS
  
  RFS issued no new circular after the circular 
  • RFS 2025.03-01 - Subject: System Migration Update – Progress & Future Enhancements
Clients are welcome to contact us if they require a copy of any circular.
NEWS FROM NAMFISA
  
Notes of the Industry meeting of 27 March
  
 
NAMFISA’s quarterly industry meeting took place at NIPAM on 27 March. For an early insight into the discussions, our Mrs Carmen Diehl provided the following notes of the meeting:
 
  1. Opening and Welcoming
    • Lovisa Indongo-Namandje chaired the meeting. 
  2. Approval of the Agenda
    • No other matters were added, and the agenda was approved. 
  3. Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting held on 10 September 2024
    • The minutes were approved. 
  4. Standing Items
    • Update from RFIN
      • Saima Pokolo (RFIN director) informed the meeting that RFIN now operates virtually. No permanent staff is employed, and outsourced services include those of a secretary, strategic advisor and bookkeeper.
      • She further informed the meeting of key activities and key focus areas for 2025 – refer to slides.
      • RFIN’s objective is to equip trustees with the tools to carry out their duties, including training. One of the RFIN offerings in this regard is the Four-Part Leading in a Changing World series. The first part was completed in February 2025, with the other three parts scheduled for each remaining quarter of 2025.
      • On the presentation slide 10, under Training, reference is made to “FIMA Trustee Toolkit with NAMFISA”. It was clarified at the meeting that the development of the trustee toolkit is the responsibility of NAMFISA and is not within RFIN’s authority. 
  5. Feedback on statutory submissions
  6. Complaints Lodged with NAMFISA
    • Refer to NAMFISA presentation slides
    • There is an improvement in the number of complaints lodged, with most of the complaints resolved in favour of the fund. The reason why members still lodge complaints with NAMFISA seems to be a lack of communication between the fund and the members. Members are often not aware of the fund rules.
    • Most complaints relate to retirement annuities. Brokers approach retrenched members and persuaded them to put their money in retirement annuities. Members are not sufficiently informed and become alarmed only when they cannot access the funds anymore.
    • All financial institutions are encouraged to implement the complaints handling procedure as per the NAMFISA circular issued in 2023. This will be looked at with the next inspections. 
  7. Regulatory Framework Update
    • Further General chapter Standards have been drafted and presented to the NAMFISA Exco – listed on slide 40.
    • The NAMFISA Board approved the following General Chapter Standards:
      • Standard No. GEN.S.10.10 (Outsourcing Standard)
      • Standard No. GEN.S.10.2 (Fit & Proper) – although approved, further Industry comments were invited
      • Standard No. GEN.S.10.21 (Treating Customers Fairly)
    • Proposed Amendments to Pension Funds Act Regulations
      • These are currently with the Minister for consideration, and NAMFISA is awaiting feedback. 
  8. New matters
    • Leveraging Technology in the Pension Funds Industry
      • NAMFISA’s regulatory sandbox is open for existing and new entities with an innovative business model.
      • Pentech: Fintech innovations tailored to optimise the pension fund industry.
      • Intellectual property will stay with the owner. 
  9. ICAN AFS template
    • There were several submissions in the last couple of months where the audited AFS missed key information and deviated from the template.
    • Some funds received feedback letters regarding their audited AFS, which did not comply with the ICAN AFS template.
    • NB that audited AFS must comply with the 2022 ICAN circular. 
  10. Market Conduct risks in the pension funds industry
    • Given recent announcements of retrenchments and possible retrenchments in the diamond and mining industry, care should be taken to protect pension fund members.
    • Retrenched pension fund members are easy targets for people chasing commission and might commit to products which are not suitable for them.
    • The issues are more on the retail level, and there are fewer issues on pension funds, where a board of trustees is responsible for managing the fund.
    • It was noted by the meeting participants that more stringent entry requirements are needed for intermediaries. 
  11. Any Other Business
    • None
Download the NAMFISA presentation slides here...
 
  
LEGAL SNIPPETS
 
Admissibility of affidavits as evidence in death benefit claims
 
  Under SA [and Namibian] law, an affidavit is a statement made under oath by an individual to a Commissioner of Oaths. While the person making the statement does so knowing that if it contains false information, they could face a jail sentence, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the affidavit is proof of the claims it contains. This means that trustees should be wary of simply accepting affidavits as substantial evidence to back a benefit claim.

Section 37 requires the trustees to
  • identify dependants,
  • effect an equitable distribution between dependants and nominees and
  • determine an appropriate mode of payment.
The SA Pension Fund Adjudicator believes trustees must consider the following factors when deciding on the distribution of benefits:
  • the age of the parties,
  • the relationship with the deceased,
  • the extent of dependency, the financial affairs of the dependants and
  • the future earnings potential and prospects of dependants.
In the case of Maake vs Old Mutual Superfund and Old Mutual Life Assurance Company, the adjudicator’s ruling shows that affidavits alone are not enough.

Download the full article by Wahida Parker in Pensions World of June 2015 here…
 
   
Death benefit payment: L Dickson v Netcare Pension Fund and another
 
  Introduction:

The deceased nominated the complainant to receive 100% of the benefit. The deceased passed away on 21 June 2019, and the nomination form was completed in 2004. The fund allocated 100% of the benefit to the deceased’s mother.
 
The complainant submitted that her grandparents raised the deceased from the age of four months, and for most of her life, she had an estranged relationship with her mother. The mother lived in the UK until her retirement and then relocated to South Africa, where she lives off her pension and rental income from her 5-bedroom house.
 
The mother is 73 years old, resides on her own, and only has herself to fend for. From 1999 to 2008, the complainant and the deceased were in a romantic relationship and engaged. Despite the break-up, they maintained a close friendship and agreed to keep their nominations unchanged, as she did with her PPS policy. Further, this was the deceased’s wish.
 
The complainant submitted that the board’s decision be revised to reflect a more equitable split between her and the deceased’s mother. According to the complainant, a fair and equitable award would be 50% each.
 
The fund submitted that the board had to consider the deceased’s Nomination of Beneficiary Form completed in 2004, in which the complainant was nominated to receive 100% of the death benefit against the deceased’s addendum to her will in which she had nominated her mother to receive 100% of her death benefit in 2017. Further, since the deceased had not updated the said form, the board elected rather to allocate 100% of the death benefit to the deceased’s mother in line with the will and the submitted proof of financial dependency on the deceased.
 
The Adjudicator held that:
  • A nominee is not entitled to be considered a beneficiary because she was financially dependent on the deceased. The entitlement stems from the fact that the person concerned was nominated by the deceased, and nothing more is required. A nominee does not have to prove that she was financially dependent on the deceased at the time of death.
  • The deceased’s mother qualified as a dependant because the deceased did provide financial support to her. Therefore, the provisions of section 37C(1)(bA) of the Act apply because there is both a dependant and a nominee.
  • The board failed to consider the extent of the deceased’s mother’s financial dependency on the deceased and the fact that she is the sole heir to the deceased’s entire estate, including a 50% share of a house, is receiving a pension, receives income from a rental property she owns in Somerset West, Cape Town and the amount is large enough to cover her living expenses and pay a portion to the complainant.
  • The Adjudicator found that the fund failed to conduct a proper investigation.
  • The fund’s decision was set aside, and it was ordered to reinvestigate the claim.
 
SNIPPETS FOR THE PENSION FUND INDUSTRY
 
Diversify or di-worse-ify: The fine balance between smart strategy and risky overload
 
  This article takes a sharp look at one of investing’s golden rules — diversification — and flips it on its head. While spreading your investments is key to managing risk, going overboard can backfire, leading to a bloated, underperforming portfolio that’s harder to manage and less effective.

Charize Beukes of Brenthurst Wealth Management unpacks how trying to “own everything” can reduce returns and shares practical tips on finding the sweet spot between smart diversification and risky overload.

The article also shares clear, actionable strategies to help you refine your portfolio and avoid common traps:
  • Focus on quality over quantity – choose fewer, high-conviction investments that actually move the needle.
  • Diversify across sectors, asset classes, and regions, not just by adding more assets.
  • Rebalance regularly to stay aligned with your goals and avoid hidden overexposures.
  • Stick to your risk profile – don’t let hype or fear push you off course.
  • Learn to say no to trendy or unnecessary investments that complicate your strategy.
Read the full article by Charize Beukes in Moneyweb of 19 March 2025 to learn how to streamline your investments, avoid common pitfalls, and build a portfolio that works harder and smarter for your goals here...
 
 
Diversifying your portfolio beyond forex
  
  This article raises the following key poiThis article highlights the risks of overtrading and over-diversifying in forex trading and emphasises the importance of strategic diversification. Roger Eskinazi, Managing Partner at Tickmill, shares insights on how diversifying a portfolio across asset classes, including stock indices, commodities, and bonds, can help mitigate risks and unlock new profit opportunities. By balancing different assets, traders can offset volatility, hedge against inflation, and preserve capital during economic downturns. The article also examines how instruments such as stock indices, commodities, and bonds can complement forex trading, providing stability and potential returns.
 
If you're looking to refine your trading strategy and manage risk effectively, this article in Money Marketing of 3 April 2025 is a must-read...
 
 
SNIPPETS OF GENERAL INTEREST
  
Vishing: The Voice Scam You Need to Know About
  
  Vishing (voice phishing) is a fast-growing scam where cybercriminals call victims pretending to be from a trusted institution, like a bank, and pressure them into sharing sensitive information such as passwords or PINS. This tactic is increasingly sophisticated due to spoofing technology and the emotional urgency created over a call. Reports show a 442% increase in vishing attacks in late 2024 and a 1,265% rise in voice-based scams since the launch of AI tools like Chatgpt.

Steps to Avoid Being Vished
  1. Never share personal info over the phone, especially if the call is unexpected.
  2. Hang up immediately if the call feels suspicious or pressured.
  3. Verify the caller by contacting the company directly using their official contact details, not the number shown on the caller ID.
  4. Use spam call blockers or call-filtering apps to screen out potential scam calls.
  5. Stay informed and cautious — awareness is key to avoiding manipulation.
Bottom line: Don’t let a phone call pressure you into handing over sensitive data. Pause, question, and verify, stay alert to stay safe.

Read the full article in Cover of 7 April 2025, here...
 
 
Investing offshore: A brief guide.
 
 
With South Africa’s economic challenges and low GDP growth, more investors are looking beyond local borders for better returns. But how exactly can they do this? Investing offshore is simpler than many think, especially when aiming for hard currencies like the US dollar, euro, or pound.

One of the key hurdles is transferring money abroad, but South African citizens can easily take out up to R1 million per year (R2 million for couples) using their Single Discretionary Allowance. A tax clearance certificate is required for larger amounts, though this process has become more complicated. Despite these hurdles, the reward is worth it — investing offshore provides access to global markets and assets, potentially protecting against local economic risks.

Offshore investments come in various forms, from flexible discretionary investments to endowments offering tax benefits and estate planning advantages. These investments allow exposure to diverse global sectors like healthcare and technology. Fixed investments provide a safer option with some capital assurance, while asset swaps and feeder funds allow offshore exposure through local funds.

Opening an offshore bank account might also be beneficial for those serious about maximising their offshore investments. Given the complexities, seeking advice from a qualified professional is always recommended to ensure the best strategy is in place.

Read the article by Magnus Haystek in Moneyweb of 26 March here...
 
 
Essentials of a power of attorney
 
 
Granting someone the authority to manage your financial affairs is a significant decision that requires careful consideration. A Power of Attorney (POA) allows an agent to act on your behalf, whether due to illness, travel, or other circumstances. But with this responsibility comes risks, so understanding the rights, responsibilities, and potential pitfalls is crucial.

Broadly speaking, a power of attorney is a written declaration by one person (the principal) to bestow powers on another person (the agent) to perform juristic acts (i.e. actions that are intended and capable of having a legal effect) on their behalf. A power of attorney is not a contract but, rather, is made possible in terms of the South African [and Namibian] law of agency – the basis of which is that an agent is not permitted to perform any juristic act that the principal is incapable of performing.

A POA can be general, giving the agent broad authority, or special, with more limited powers for specific tasks like managing tax affairs. However, in South Africa, the process isn’t straightforward. There’s no standard form; certain situations, like property purchases or banking, have specific requirements.

For those with elderly parents or individuals losing mental capacity, managing finances becomes even more challenging. While a POA can provide assistance, it automatically terminates if the principal becomes mentally incapacitated or passes away, potentially complicating matters.

The document must be carefully drafted to ensure it’s legally valid, and professional guidance is recommended to protect all parties involved. Whether managing a loved one’s affairs or considering a POA for your own reasons, it’s essential to know the risks and ensure all legal steps are followed.

Read the article by Eric Jordaan of Crue Investments in Moneyweb of 26 March here...
 
 
AND FINALLY...
  
Wise words from wise men
  
  "The Budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled,
public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be
tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be
curtailed, lest Rome becomes bankrupt. People must again learn to work
instead of living on public assistance." ~ Cicero (106-43 B.C.)
 
  
  
  Unsubscribe
If you do not want to receive these newsletters {unsubscribe}click here...{/unsubscribe}

Disclaimer
Whilst we have taken all reasonable measures to ensure that the results reflected herein are correct, Benchmark Retirement Fund and RFS Fund Administrators (Pty) Ltd do not accept any liability for the accuracy of the information and no decision should be taken on the basis of the information contained herein before confirming the detail with the relevant portfolio manager.